<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Conflicts Check</title>
	<link>http://www.dancanonlaw.com/blog</link>
	<description>Being a Highly-Learned Treatise on the Law, Music, Suffering, Culture, Society, and Lap Dogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 01:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Explications</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you&#8217;re ever wondering why this thing is called &#8220;Conflicts Check,&#8221; I just caught myself reading about Jainism, thinking about what a great religion it is, and simultaneously shopping for BMW&#8217;s online.
Pretentious enlightened hippie, or pretentious yuppie douchebag? Hell, I don&#8217;t even know. I straddle multiple worlds, folks.
 Tweet This Post]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dancanonlaw.com/blog/?p=127</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Suffering and the Law: The First in an Infinite-Part Series</title>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a subject (and a post) I&#8217;ve been thinking about for a long time. As I sit down to write, I still am unsure how to approach it.
There is a question that has kept me up more nights than I can count: How do you alleviate suffering as a plaintiffs&#8217; lawyer?
I realize this is [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dancanonlaw.com/blog/?p=109</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Finest Friend to Man and Lawyer Alike</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In my research for this case (which I expect to take to trial sometime this year), I came across this footnote in Miller v. Clark County, 340 F. 3d 959 (9th Cir. 2003). In addition to being one of the longest footnotes in modern jurisprudential history, and despite coming from a very pro-law-enforcement perspective, the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dancanonlaw.com/blog/?p=103</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Supremes</title>
		<description><![CDATA[As hinted at in my last blog post, which was&#8230;oh, a couple of years ago, I argued before the Supremes last month.
Not these Supremes:

And not these:

But these ones here:

Yes friends, that&#8217;s the Supreme Court of Kentucky. This post contains a little background info, and a few words, about our Supreme Court (keeping in mind that [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dancanonlaw.com/blog/?p=93</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Warning: Post Not Intended for the Law-Averse</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the extreme, unprecedented adversity of the last couple of weeks, some cool things have happened. I&#8217;m not inclined to blog about deeply personal adversity (and let&#8217;s face it, there&#8217;s still LiveJournal and, you know, real literature for that), so I&#8217;ll blog about the cool stuff.
First, The Godard Group has invited me to be interviewed [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dancanonlaw.com/blog/?p=89</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Keeping the Blame off the Victim: Civil Rights Protections for Domestic Violence Survivors</title>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re up for some light holiday reading, my article from this month&#8217;s The Advocate is available online here.
Be good to each other this Thanksgiving. And in general.
 Tweet This Post]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dancanonlaw.com/blog/?p=87</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bridging the Gap &#8211; This Year in Multiplicity</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there. Yes, I know&#8230;in my last post I promised to write more. That was in July. But look, I&#8217;ve been busy since then. Busy enough to rack up about 300 unread comments on 5 posts, mostly consisting of &#8211; you guessed it &#8211; Russian porn ads, Nigerian scams, and nondescript gibberish. Let me give [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dancanonlaw.com/blog/?p=80</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Why Not Me?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[It has recently come to my attention that some people &#8211; and not just my wife and mom &#8211; are occasionally reading this thing. So, yeah, sorry about not posting since&#8230;uhm&#8230;March. If you posted a comment forever ago that wasn&#8217;t about Ambien or Russian porn, I probably didn&#8217;t approve it &#8217;til just now. Sorry for [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dancanonlaw.com/blog/?p=68</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Damn, GINA!</title>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you that don&#8217;t know, I&#8217;m more than a little interested in legal issues facing cancer patients and survivors. In fact, you might say I have a vested interest in the subject. Last month, I gave an informal lecture (to a whopping three people) at Gilda&#8217;s Club on the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dancanonlaw.com/blog/?p=65</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Creative Endeavors (Or: This Month in Capriciousness)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m afraid this whole wernal* thing is off to a slow start.  Part of the reason is the trial I had in family court last week. Another part is the other (bigger) cases that are coming up for trial in the next few months, and another is just general day-to-day lawyering stuff. Thankfully, I&#8217;ve been [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dancanonlaw.com/blog/?p=24</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
